By David B. Lewis
This well timed and significant publication assesses the impression of laws on public curiosity disclosures across the world, in addition to atmosphere an schedule for destiny examine on whistleblowing. Combining either theoretical and functional equipment, this designated booklet deals a close exam of a few of the foremost statutory provisions within the united kingdom and explores the best way courts have interpreted them. The professional individuals examine the united kingdom version with different techniques taken in Australia, the united states in addition to the remainder of Europe, and concentrate on the teachings that may be realized from the present perform of whistleblowing. They evaluation the contents and alertness of private reporting/whistleblowing techniques, and draw upon major empirical examine. This ebook may be of significant curiosity to lecturers, postgraduate scholars, practitioners and policymakers within the fields of employment legislations, human source administration, company ethics and company governance.
Read or Download A Global Approach to Public Interest Disclosure: What Can We Learn from Existing Whistleblowing Legislation and Research? PDF
Similar constitutional law books
This publication explores uncomplicated questions relating to constitutional idea. First, in view of a dedication to democratic self-rule and frequent confrontation on questions of price, how is the production of a valid constitutional regime attainable? moment, what needs to be actual a couple of structure if the regime that it helps is to maintain its declare to legitimacy?
The function that precedent performs in constitutional selection making is a perennially divisive topic between students of legislation and American politics. the talk rages over either empirical and normative elements of the problem: To what quantity are the best courtroom, Congress, and the administrative department restricted by means of precedent?
Is liberty or democracy the first constitutional price? At a time while american citizens are more and more dealing with violations in their civil liberties, Timothy Sandefur's insightful new ebook explains why the assertion of Independence, with its doctrines at the primacy of liberty, the usual rights of guy, and the bounds on valid govt, should still function the guidepost for figuring out the structure.
Highlighting turning issues within the shaping of the Australian kingdom seeing that Federation, this assortment examines instances from their criminal and political context, via their implementation and eventual effect on constitutional reform. Contributions through famous constitutional legal professionals, judges and former leader justices make sure the price of the research.
Extra resources for A Global Approach to Public Interest Disclosure: What Can We Learn from Existing Whistleblowing Legislation and Research?
2543–4). Chairman of the SEC, Mary Schapiro, also stated at a Congressional hearing that the SEC plans to propose rewards to encourage Wall Street insiders to come forward with substantive information about investor fraud (Kelton, 2009, p. A12). 11 The recently passed Recovery Act contains limited protection for whistleblowers (USLW, 2009c). The McCaskill amendment protects an employee of a private employer which receives funds under the Act. If the employee discloses gross mismanagement or waste of stimulus funds, a substantial danger to public interests related to use of the funds, an abuse of authority, or a violation of a law, rule or regulation relating to the funds, to a government agency, a court or grand jury, or a person with supervisory authority over the employee, the whistleblower is protected from retaliation.
She has now sued ANI on grounds of illegal termination of contract. The annual report of the Ombudsperson gives us some insight into how the protection measures work. The 2006 report shows that the Ombudsperson received five cases. Protection was granted in all cases. In 2007 there were only two cases and protection was also granted. One of these cases was heavily mediatized. The protection was not lost because of that. The whistleblower experienced retaliation (he was fired). The Ombudsperson started an investigation into the causal relation of raising concern and being fired, but this has been stopped because the whistleblower has brought his case before the court.
Markopolos said that he did not press his charges even harder because he feared retribution from the powerful Madoff. He recommended that the SEC set up a unit to receive tips similar to that of the Internal Revenue Service (Zuckerman and Gautier-Villars, 2009). Others who questioned Madoff’s performance numbers failed to come forward at all (Lucchetti, 2009, p. C4). As in the Madoff situation, allegations about another fraudster, Stanford, had ‘dogged R. , 2009, p. A14). In an earlier failed attempt to bring problems in the financial derivatives market to light, the whistleblower was repeatedly rebuffed and forbidden to even gather information about how the market operated.